A Perspective on “Waiting: A Nonbeliever’s Higher Power” 9

At the end of this week, I look forward to interviewing Marya Hornbacher about her book: “Waiting: A Nonbeliever’s Higher Power” (Hazelden Publishing, May 2011)

I think believers have as much to learn from agnostics about faith as the other way around. And this book is a good start to the new millennium. What she means by waiting as a higher power (I think) is that spirituality isn’t about knowing, getting what you want, or those “aha” moments. It’s about the vulnerability of not knowing, doubting, seeking; “waiting” for the answers to come, regardless of if they come at all. If we are waiting, this is a state of humbleness as we accept that we aren’t in charge, don’t have control, and we don’t know it all.

She says the absence of God in her life is not the absence of spiritual living because sobriety is based on a program of action. Sobriety, at least by way of the 12 steps isn’t an intellectual process; it isn’t about what I think or believe and no one has proven to me that a deity picks and chooses to whom He grants sobriety. Recovery is all about what I do; it’s what I do after I get off my knees that counts.

Marya’s spirituality is a room full of people; I like that idea. Maybe we all have this Sunday-school idea of “being in the light” alone – enlightened, at one with god. But to Marya, it’s only when she is in flight, in action, or in the service of others that the spirit is flowing. The self-indulgent navel gazing gets us ready but it isn’t a ‘spiritual’ state, so to speak.

I finished the book and I find no bitterness, no reactive bigotry. The religious discrimination in Twelve Step programs is very polite most of the time. But for atheists, why wouldn’t someone who was tired of the preaching members praying for them, lash out with equal stubbornness? Shit, I just ranted all over Chad H’s article, Not the “God” Word. I get fed up at times. I came out of the closet about not believing a God exists and Letting Go of God has been the most liberating step in my sobriety. It’s not for everyone, not for the faint of heart. It is lonely at first, but not as lonely as being a faker in a program of fellows, some of which are drunk on dogma.

By “drunk” I mean that belief shouldn’t be over-indulged. None of us should go from “this is what I believe” over the deep end to “this is how it is.” When we are drunk on idealism, self-righteousness, or any other intoxicant, we can’t think straight. We can hurt people and we do. We say things that are insensitive. Believers do that all the time in AA. At least over-indulgent believers do. The moderate believer knows he or she could be wrong, they know only a little and there are many ways to skin a cat.

Atheists can be drunk on dogma too. Calling belief in god a crutch more crippling than booze would be this type of drunk on dogma talk. Telling someone, “When you grow up you won’t need that baby-sitter, God, to tuck you in at night and tell you to brush your teeth.” Pretty obnoxious isn’t it? Well it’s no better than Bill Wilson telling an atheist “We once believed as you did.” How the fuck can he know what I believe? Just because he resisted God and I do too, that does not mean we have the same world-view. If AA told Catholics they had to convert, it wouldn’t be any more arrogant than telling someone they can’t get sober without finding God. It just isn’t true; This notion is the delusion of drunkenness.

It seems that AA finds not enough room in the middle. From one drunken, “There is no God, it’s all a crock” while we were out-there in our self-will-run-riot self-destruction, to “only Divine providence can relieve our merciless obsession” is rather naïve and extreme. In the middle there is so much room for everyone to breathe. I know that I can, like countless others, live a value-based, sober, seeking life without prayer or mythology. Others can indulge mythology without offending me so long as they don’t tell me “God as I understand Him” is inclusive language.

It might have been a good starting point last millennium, but we have to do better if AA is going to be more than a couple thousand drunks holding hands saying the Lord’s Prayer and reading the same 164 pages on our 100th anniversary. If we don’t adapt we will become obsolete, just as the Washingtonians and Oxford Group did before us.

From what I see, Marya shows no sign of fatigue from AA patronization. I look forward to hearing what her secret is. She politely explains how it is for her without preaching or drawing a line in the sand.

I live in a city where agnostic discrimination is tolerated at our intergroup and a “White Paper on Non-Believers” is being circulated as a warning about the risk to AA from giving a voice to non-Christian/Judeo sobriety. It reads like Mein Kampf. It is just the type of drunk-on-dogma discrimination that can only make AA smaller and less helpful.

Marya, I am “waiting” to hear what you have to say.

INTERVIEW will be early September, I will have more to share soon.